Will Lieberman become the new ‘King’ of Israel?

Veteran Israeli peace activist Uri Avnery posted a fascinating analysis of the mind behind Soviet turned Israeli, Avigdor Lieberman, and it does not bode well for future interactions with the government of Israel.

Titled ‘Cold Revenge’, Avnery goes down the list of members of the Knesset and Lieberman’s cabinet that have been recently and unceremoniously cast-aside. The article underscores Lieberman’s anti-democratic tendencies and leads me to believe the international community is in for a nasty surprise. 

Amongst many liberal American Jews, Lieberman’s name, when spoken, sounds almost like a curse. He doesn’t represent the ideals that they supposedly share with Israel, the fiction that has long sense been discredited, in fact, he is sometimes held up as a foil to Bibi, who when compared to Lieberman, looks like a moderate. Avnery brings up a striking point, which sent shivers down my spine and that is that is Bibi’s pairing with Lieberman all but locked in his coming electoral victory, but what happens when he tries to make a concession to appease the international community, already up in arms over his retaliatory plans to finally settle E-1. Lieberman will have the mandate, handed to him by his increasingly right leaning and fascist constituency to kick Bibi to the curb.

While Bibi may be still be considered the ‘King’ of Israel in the United States, he has been in power for too long and has taken his role in Israel for granted. The further the Israeli body-politic shifts to the right, the more likely Avnery’s prediction is likely to become true, Lieberman will jettison Netanyahu and the world community will inherit a far more intractable problem.

This week, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution once again calling for Israel to open its nuclear facilities to inspection and become a signatory to the non-proliferation treaty. The United States, once again, stood behind Israel and its undeclared nuclear weapons capability.  What will the world say when the lone nuclear power in the middle east, long armed by the United States and protected every step of the way, no longer responds to even the simplest of request; the nuclear-armed brat that slams the door in the face of her ever-loving mother. She is entering her teen years now.

There is no time like the present for the United States to take an evenhanded approach to its foreign policy in the region, the further that Israel shifts to the right, the less likely there is to be a peaceful outcome. With Lieberman at the helm and populist leaders taking the reigns throughout the neighborhood, it will not be long until another conflict breaks out. Will the United States come to its senses before it is too late to turn back? I sure hope so.




‘Bearing witness involves being truthful and as factually accurate as possible, regardless of what sort of consensus is operative in the corridors of power. In a biased media and a political climate that is orchestrated from above, the objectivity of bearing witness will itself be challenged as ‘biased’ or ‘one-sided’ whenever it ventures onto prohibited terrain. In actuality, the purpose of bearing witness is to challenge bias, not to perpetuate it, but in our Orwellian media world, it is bias that is too often presented as balanced, and truth witnessing that is either ignored or derided.’
Well said Mr. Falk.
Check out his blog Citizen Pilgrimage

Drones Overseas Lead to Drones at Home

I highly recommend this article by Philip Giraldi: http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2012/07/11/drones-overseas-lead-to-drones-at-home/
Giraldi, according to his bio is a counter-terrorism specialist and former military intelligence officer who served in the Near East region. The article examines the use of UAVs (read drones) within the borders of the United States. This is troubling for a variety of reasons, Giraldi smartly acknowledges the ‘universal truth’, ‘that once a new technology is developed, it will be used and a legal framework will quickly be devised to enable that to happen.’ The use of drones within the United States under the guise of protecting our national security is likely to infringe on our basic rights as United States citizens. It is especially troublesome to see something which has been practiced by our military and intelligence services on foreign nationals being brought home.
Lets hope the American people can see the illegality and immorality of using our drones for extrajudicial killings abroad and organize against such practices before we are faced with a security state which uses the same technology and similar practices against us at home.